BlogCircles

Sponsor Media

BlogCircles Resources

BlogCircles Blogroll

  • Wikipedia
    Is likely the most commonly known public wiki and according to Wikipedia, it is the worlds largest functioning wiki. It is a “free encyclopaedia that anyone can edit” and thus is an “open source”, where open source refers to allowing anyone to edit content.
  • MySpace
    Likely the most popular online social networking site in the English-speaking world. The over one hundred million user accounts and the current American legislation that seeks to eliminate its presence in public institutions both attest to its resounding popularity.
  • Second Life
    Second Life blurs the line between reality and the virtual-world. Members of Second Life meet, socialize, entertain, govern, work, pay taxes, and generally go about daily life in the virtual world.
  • Sharepoint
    A free application created by Microsoft which enables users to share information, collaborate on documents, and collect team knowledge over the internet or an internal secured corporate network. Think of sharepoint as the ‘business’ version of an online social network.
  • del.icio.us
    A service that provides a way for people to organize their favourite websites. Much like many other social bookmarking services, del.icio.us is not private; therefore, whatever information one puts in becomes available for everyone to see.
  • StumbleUpon
    Enables “social surfing” – it retrieves websites that other Net surfers deem relevant to you according to your user profile.
  • Yahoo My Web 2.0
    Taking a new approach to community-based searching. Users create a personal web and interact with a trusted community of contacts, upon whose expertise their searching relies.
  • Slashdot
    Predates the social bookmarking phenomenon, having been created in 1997, but it is a forerunner of the social bookmarking news sites.
  • Digg
    A social bookmarking site devoted to news. Users submit links to news stories, and other users vote on them (or “digg” them). The most popular stories appear on the homepage, sometimes within minutes of their original posting; alternatively, if a story does not receive enough “diggs” within twenty-four hours, it drops out of the upcoming stories queue.
  • Furl
    Both a social bookmarking tool and a personal archive; it saves a copy of each page a user bookmarks. This can obviously be very useful.
  • Flickr
    A photo sharing website, thus it is a unique social bookmarking tool because it contains digital images. Flickr serves the same purpose as the social bookmarking tools that contain links because Flickr photos are also tagged and browsed.
  • YouTube
    This is another example of a social bookmarking tool that deviates from the concept of linked text. YouTube contains videos - frequently homemade videos.
  • Connotea
    A free social bookmarking site that is geared towards clinicians and scientists. Users can save and tag links to any web pages that they want to remember and/or reference.
  • Many-to-Many
    A group weblog on social software.
  • Socialtext 2.0
    A fundamental redesign of the user interface, resolving the complexity that confronts new wiki users while preserving the power of a flexible enterprise tool.

Sponsor Links


My Online Status

Recent Comments

Sponsor Video

« über bloggers | Main | Applications of Social Networking to Medical Treatment »

Blogger's Code of Conduct - Tim O'Reilly's Draft

We celebrate the blogosphere because it embraces frank and open conversation. But frankness does not have to mean lack of civility. We present this Blogger Code of Conduct in hopes that it helps create a culture that encourages both personal expression and constructive conversation.

  1. We take responsibility for our own words and for the comments we allow on our blog.
    We are committed to the "Civility Enforced" standard: we will not post unacceptable content, and we'll delete comments that contain it.

    We define unacceptable content as anything included or linked to that:
    - is being used to abuse, harass, stalk, or threaten others
    - is libelous, knowingly false, ad-hominem, or misrepresents another person,
    - infringes upon a copyright or trademark
    - violates an obligation of confidentiality
    - violates the privacy of others

    We define and determine what is "unacceptable content" on a case-by-case basis, and our definitions are not limited to this list. If we delete a comment or link, we will say so and explain why. [We reserve the right to change these standards at any time with no notice.]
  2. We won't say anything online that we wouldn't say in person.
  3. We connect privately before we respond publicly.
    When we encounter conflicts and misrepresentation in the blogosphere, we make every effort to talk privately and directly to the person(s) involved--or find an intermediary who can do so--before we publish any posts or comments about the issue.
  4. When we believe someone is unfairly attacking another, we take action.
    When someone who is publishing comments or blog postings that are offensive, we'll tell them so (privately, if possible--see above) and ask them to publicly make amends.
    If those published comments could be construed as a threat, and the perpetrator doesn't withdraw them and apologize, we will cooperate with law enforcement to protect the target of the threat.
  5. We do not allow anonymous comments.
    We require commenters to supply a valid email address before they can post, though we allow commenters to identify themselves with an alias, rather than their real name.
  6. We ignore the trolls.
    We prefer not to respond to nasty comments about us or our blog, as long as they don't veer into abuse or libel. We believe that feeding the trolls only encourages them--"Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, but the pig likes it." Ignoring public attacks is often the best way to contain them.

» Tim O'Reilly / radar.oreilly.com

Comments

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.